Objective. To compare two internal fixation devices clinically in stabilisation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. Methods. Eightyseven\r\npatients were randomised upon their admission to the hospital using a sealed envelope method. Forty-five were treated with\r\nproximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) and 42 with reverse less invasive stabilisation system (LISS). The perioperative data were\r\nrecorded and compared in relation to fracture type. Results. In each type of fractures, no significant differences were found with\r\nrespect to the blood loss, the quality of reduction, the time to bony healing, and the Harris hip score between the 2 groups.The\r\nmean duration of surgery was significantly longer in reverse LISS group than in PFNA group. Conclusion. Both the PFNA and the\r\nreversed LISS are effective in the treatment of different types of intertrochanteric femur fractures. PFNA is superior to reverse LISS\r\nin terms of surgical time, weight-bearing, and perhaps fluoroscopy time.
Loading....